H1000 is on my want listing of powders also. It's possible the IMR Enduron sequence will be very well liked and I can go to that for much better availability.

They may have executed identically for me. Like Every person else I rushed to find the newer SC Edition but have now switched again. Preferably you'd like about 100% loading density. Should you have sufficient situation ability for the H4831(long) you might be in all probability much better off.

The reality that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is precisely why you're seeing greater velocities obtained with that powder, rather than Whatever you've observed With all the IMR stuff. Also good powder, but to some degree superior suited to slightly lesser scenarios by using a little bit significantly less capacity.

Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to inside the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm saving the tiny I have remaining for slide 2021. I'd start small and do the job your way up, determined by what load data you take a look at for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.

The only variance as I know it is that the SC was meant to do the job through powder actions improved (which it does). The for a longer period grains never feed effectively at all in a few steps. Thats my 02 :grin:

Any load data to guidance that? My very first assumed is it's actually not intending to burn off all of the way and velocities is going to be slow and far and wide. Could possibly be a pleasant fireworks Display screen!

I am applying it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did nicely but I used to be slightly worried about temp stability. I believe I am at seventy two grains and have all around 2850ish fps

excaliber reported: I've uncovered the exact reverse to become genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster h4831 vs h4831sc and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.

Using the smoother move properties arrives more uniform cost weights, whilst the individual grains orient more compactly, developing improved loading density.

locutus explained: I however have an excellent stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows by means of my powder steps easily.

As to the 4831 vs 4831SC, They're the exact same/similar powder cept for grain measurement. Load data h4831sc load data is interchangeable.

It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 5 shot group today. It can be just a little slower than H1000, but shoots good. Thanks for the recommendation, It really is good to know that I've bought possibilities when h4831 vs h4831sc one or the opposite powder is dried up.

arkansas or ohio i under no circumstances discovered a variation apart from the normal is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.

The truth that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is exactly why you're observing larger velocities attained with that powder, in contrast to Everything you've found Along with the IMR stuff.